Security Testing Framework

LLM Red Team Playbook

Comprehensive guide to red teaming Large Language Models. Learn advanced attack vectors, testing methodologies, and evaluation frameworks to enhance the security and robustness of AI systems.

10+
Attack Categories
50+
Test Cases
25+
Evaluation Metrics
15+
Case Studies

Purpose & Significance

Understanding why red teaming is critical for LLM security and how it enhances AI system robustness

Proactive Security
Identify vulnerabilities before malicious actors exploit them. Red teaming provides early detection of security weaknesses in LLM systems.
Model Robustness
Enhance model resilience against adversarial inputs and edge cases. Systematic testing improvesmodel reliability and safety.
Compliance & Trust
Meet regulatory requirements and build user confidence. Red teaming demonstrates commitment toAI safety standards and responsible deployment.

Red Teaming Methodology

Systematic approach to testing LLM security through structured adversarial evaluation

Core Phases

1

Reconnaissance

Gather information about the target LLM, including architecture, training data, and deployment context.

2

Attack Planning

Design attack scenarios based on identified attack vectors and potential vulnerabilities.

3

Execution

Implement attacks using automated tools and manual techniques to test model responses.

4

Analysis

Evaluate results using quantitative metrics and qualitative assessment frameworks.

5

Reporting

Document findings, provide remediation recommendations, and track improvement over time.

Key Principles

Systematic Approach

Follow structured methodology for consistent results

Ethical Guidelines

Maintain responsible disclosure and testing boundaries

Continuous Improvement

Iterate based on findings and evolving threat landscape

Comprehensive Coverage

Test multiple attack vectors and scenarios

Attack Vectors & Testing Strategies

Comprehensive catalog of LLM attack techniques and corresponding testing methodologies

Critical
Prompt Injection
Test model's resistance to malicious prompts designed to override system instructions and extract sensitive information.
Direct injection attacks
Indirect injection via data
Context manipulation
High
Jailbreaking
Evaluate techniques to bypass safety guardrails and content filters through creative prompt engineering.
Role-playing scenarios
Hypothetical contexts
Encoding obfuscation
Medium
Data Extraction
Test model's susceptibility to revealing training data, system prompts, or confidential information.
Training data leakage
System prompt extraction
Memory exploitation
Medium
Bias Exploitation
Assess model's tendency to produce biased, discriminatory, or unfair outputs across different contexts.
Demographic bias testing
Cultural sensitivity
Stereotype reinforcement
High
Adversarial Inputs
Generate carefully crafted inputs designed to cause model failures, hallucinations, or unexpected behavior.
Perturbation attacks
Edge case exploration
Stress testing
Medium
Context Manipulation
Test model's handling of context switching, memory limitations, and conversation state management.
Context window attacks
Memory poisoning
State confusion

Evaluation Metrics & Assessment

Quantitative and qualitative metrics for measuring LLM security and robustness

Quantitative Metrics

Attack Success Rate

Percentage of successful attacks across different categories and severity levels.

ASR = (Successful Attacks / Total Attempts) × 100

Robustness Score

Composite score measuring model's resistance to various attack vectors.

RS = Σ(Weight_i × Resistance_i) / Σ(Weight_i)

Response Quality Index

Measures quality degradation under adversarial conditions.

RQI = (Quality_baseline - Quality_adversarial) / Quality_baseline

Qualitative Assessment

Content Analysis

Harmful content detection
Factual accuracy assessment
Bias and fairness evaluation
Coherence and relevance

Risk Assessment

Critical VulnerabilitiesHigh Priority
Data Leakage RiskMedium
Compliance ViolationsLow
Operational ImpactMonitored

Improvement Tracking

Monitor security posture improvements over time through iterative testing cycles.

Baseline AssessmentWeek 1
Post-Mitigation TestWeek 4
Regression TestingOngoing

Implementation Best Practices

Essential guidelines for organizations implementing LLM red teaming programs

Do's

Establish Clear Objectives

Define specific security goals, success criteria, and scope boundaries before beginning red team exercises.

Use Diverse Attack Vectors

Test multiple attack categories to ensure comprehensive coverage of potential vulnerabilities.

Document Everything

Maintain detailed records of test cases, results, and remediation efforts for future reference.

Iterate Regularly

Conduct red teaming exercises throughout the development lifecycle, not just before deployment.

Don'ts

Skip Ethical Guidelines

Never conduct testing without proper authorization and ethical oversight frameworks in place.

Test in Production

Avoid running aggressive red team attacks against production systems without proper safeguards.

Ignore Context

Don't apply generic attack patterns without considering the specific use case and deployment context.

Neglect Follow-up

Don't stop at identification - ensure vulnerabilities are properly addressed and retested.

Real-World Case Studies

Learn from practical applications of LLM red teaming in enterprise environments

Critical Finding
Financial Services Chatbot
Red team discovered prompt injection vulnerabilities allowing unauthorized access to customer account information.
Attack Vector: Indirect prompt injection
Impact: Data breach risk
Mitigation: Input sanitization, context isolation
Read Full Case Study
High Risk
Healthcare AI Assistant
Testing revealed bias in medical recommendations and potential for generating harmful health advice.
Attack Vector: Bias exploitation
Impact: Patient safety risk
Mitigation: Bias detection, safety guardrails
Read Full Case Study
Success Story
E-commerce Recommendation Engine
Comprehensive red teaming program successfully identified and mitigated multiple attack vectors before deployment.
Approach: Multi-phase testing
Result: 95% vulnerability reduction
Outcome: Secure production deployment
Read Full Case Study

Tools & Resources

Essential tools and frameworks for implementing effective LLM red teaming programs

Automated Testing Frameworks
Tools for systematic and scalable red team testing of LLM systems.
• GOAT (Generative Offensive Agent Tester)
• DeepTeam Framework
• Custom attack generators
• Evaluation harnesses
Explore Tools
Assessment Templates
Ready-to-use templates and checklists for comprehensive security evaluation.
• Red team planning templates
• Attack vector checklists
• Evaluation scorecards
• Reporting frameworks
Download Templates
Training Materials
Educational resources for building red teaming expertise and capabilities.
• Red teaming methodologies
• Attack technique guides
• Hands-on workshops
• Certification programs
Start Learning

Start Your LLM Red Team Program

Implement comprehensive security testing for your LLM systems with our proven methodologies and tools